Legal Opinion
Speckels v. Baldwin
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1994No. 17987PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice (on reassignment).
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES
Taxpayer Jerome Speckels sought to declare null and void a lease-purchase agreement between the City of Custer City (City) and Homes, Inc., a for-profit corporation which included the Custer City Attorney, Gerald Baldwin, as one of its principals. Following trial on January 8, 1992, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were entered by the trial court upholding the contract. On appeal, we consider the following issues:
I. Does SDCL 6-1-1 apply to the lease-purchase agreement herein?
II. Does SDCL 6-1-1 apply to Baldwin?
III. Does…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Discipline of LaprathSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Hanig v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Aberdeen v. RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Discipline of MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.