Legal Opinion
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 2, 1974No. Civ. A. 4-70026PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the owner of a drug store, sells electric light bulbs and brings this antitrust case charging that the defendant utility company has damaged him in his business. 1 The defendant, The Detroit Edison Company, supplies residential subscribers with electric light bulbs for such homes. Plaintiff claims that this anticompetitive practice injures him since he must sell his light bulbs while defendant replaces these bulbs without charge when they burn out, and thus he contends defendant has violated both the Sherman and the Clayton Acts (more…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., Doing Business as Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Gas Light Company of Columbus v. Georgia Power Company and the Southern CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- Gambrel v. Kentucky Board of DentistryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.