Legal Opinion

Potstada v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1973No. Civ. 30697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendants City of Oakland (hereinafter referred to as "the City”) and Robert McCurdy from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries and property damage arising out of a collision occurring on October 15, 1966, between the City’s police car, driven by McCurdy, and plaintiff’s automobile. The only issue presented to the trial court was whether plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations.

In December 1966, plaintiff, an attorney at law, had a conversation with A. G. Jackson, a claims investigator for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Denham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Isaacson v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Kane v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Rogers v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wheeler v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Bank of America v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Orr v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Quintanar v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API