Legal Opinion
Isaacson v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1968No. Civ. 24631; Civ. 24861PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
The parties before us have cross-appealed from a judgment in a negligence action following a court trial, awarding plaintiff Ralph Isaacson $8,933.72. Plaintiff insists that the judgment is inadequate as a matter of law. Defendants City of Oakland and Charles B. Thomas contend that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.
On January 30, 1964, defendant Thomas, during the course of his employment as a policeman by the City of Oakland, drove an automobile into the rear end of a pick-up truck operated by plaintiff, who suffered physical injury and property damage as a result.
On May 7,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Perez v. Golden Empire Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Zapanta v. Universal Care, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lucchesi v. Bar-O Boys RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.