Legal Opinion
Denham v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1968No. Civ. 31098PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AISO, J. pro tem. *
This action arises from a contract entered into April 9, 1963, wherein plaintiff, James E. Den-ham, agreed to construct for the defendant, County of Los Angeles, a vivarium (animal housing and testing annex) at the Olive View Hospital for the sum of $170,486.
By his third amended complaint (setting forth six counts), plaintiff seeks to recover a total of $31,655.40, together with interest thereon, claiming an unwarranted deduction of $7,100 by the County as liquidated damages for late completion of the structure, $9,190.50, plus interest, for performance of extra work not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tubbs v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Valvo v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kleinecke v. Montecito Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.