J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
*651 Here we conclude that plaintiff J.M.'s suit is barred because he failed to comply with the requirements of the Government Claims Act. In a belated claim presented to defendant Huntington Beach Union High School District (the District), J.M. alleged he was injured in a school football game. Although a trainer advised the coach that J.M. might have suffered a concussion, he was allowed to participate in full contact practice several days later. He was subsequently diagnosed with double concussion syndrome. On the facts alleged, J.M.'s personal injury action accrued on October 31, 2011, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Esparza v. Safeway, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Douglass v. Serenivision, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Sanchez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Dimacali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.