Legal Opinion

Prewitt and Sampson v. City of Dallas

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 23, 1986No. 05-85-01058-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANY, Justice.

Prewitt and Sampson, a partnership in the practice of law, and Brenda Prewitt, a partner in that firm (Prewitt), appeal a summary judgment for $3,179.39 in favor of the City of Dallas. Prewitt asserts in three points of error that the trial court erred by denying her motion for summary judgment, granting the City’s motion for summary judgment, and denying her counterclaim for attorney’s fees. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The City of Dallas filed this suit to recoup workers’ compensation benefits that it had paid to its employee,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Houston National Bank v. BiberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  4. Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Plessner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. DeBell v. Texas General Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Edge Petroleum Operating Co. v. GPR Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. LedbetterTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Autry v. Dearman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Home Indemnity Co. v. Pate, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Rowland & Rowland, P.C. v. Texas Employers Indemnity Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API