Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Plessner

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 21, 1984No. 01-84-0415-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BULLOCK, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of the appellees’ motions for summary judgment.

Metropolitan Transit Authority, “MTA,” filed a declaratory judgment action against Richard Plessner, Thomas B. Schlotzhauer, Samuel J. Miller, and William L. Lane. MTA sought a determination of its right to the entire subrogation interest in settlement proceeds from third-party claims made by its employees after the employees had recovered workers’ compensation claims from MTA.

The facts are undisputed. MTA, a political subdivision of the State of Texas, is self-insured and provides…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Anderson v. PenixTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Highway Department v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Austin v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Union Carbide Corp. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Rossano v. Townsend, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. City of Carrollton v. Popescu, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Prewitt and Sampson v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Wilkomirski v. Texas Criminal Information Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API