Shannon v. Baltz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bok,
The chancellor adjudged the case for the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed.
It involves slightly over seven acres of land in Gfladwyne, Montgomery County, which ran behind several adjoining properties and would have protected them against further development. Nine landowners, including plaintiffs, were originally involved. One of them, Dr. Shannon, after discussing the situation with the others, approached defendant Baltz & Company, a real estate brokerage firm, in January, 1955, and spoke with its employe Pinder. The doctor testified: “And I assigned him…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamberg v. BarskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Kern v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Schrager v. CoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- E. W. Coast Service Corporation v. PapahagisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Casari v. Victoria Amusement Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sylvester v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. ScheckterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Scott v. PurcellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.