Legal Opinion

Scott v. Purcell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1979No. 780PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the refusal to take off orders of compulsory nonsuit.

In reviewing the propriety of the orders, we must apply the rule stated in Shechter v. Shechter, 366 Pa. 30, 33, 76 A.2d 753, 755 (1950), where the Supreme Court said that a nonsuit “should only be entered in a clear case where the plaintiff cannot recover under any view of the evidence with every doubt resolved against its entry and all inferences drawn most favorably to the plaintiff. As a general rule unless there are no conflicting inferences to be drawn it is far better to hear the defense so that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. VollrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Shechter v. SHECHTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Houseman v. Girard Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Volunteer Fire Co. v. Hilltop Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API