Casari v. Victoria Amusement Enterprises, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
From the decree entered in this equity proceeding plaintiffs, 181 in number, and defendants both appeal. A brief was filed under Rule 61 and argument made in behalf of certain persons not parties to the suit, who are shareholders of Victoria Amusement Enterprises, Inc., one of the defendants.
To state all the facts to which our attention is called would require a quite lengthy recital, and would be productive of no worth-while result, so far as making clear the real issue and the equitable principles which are to be invoked in deciding it, as one fact dominates…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bergner v. BergnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Cameron v. Townsend Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Bachrach v. FlemingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- Capital Bank and Trust Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Groh v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Tigue v. Steger (In Re Tigue)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Midstate Amusement Corporation v. RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.