Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 13, 1996No. ACM31880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SENANDER, Judge:

The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer members, of wrongful use and possession of cocaine and marijuana. Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1994). His approved sentence is a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 18 months, and reduction to E-l. The appellant asserts four errors: lack of knowing and voluntary consent to urinalysis; error by the military judge in failing to allow appellant to present polygraph results to support his credibility on a motion in limine; factual and legal sufficiency…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API