United States v. Baker
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SENANDER, Judge:
The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer members, of wrongful use and possession of cocaine and marijuana. Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1994). His approved sentence is a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 18 months, and reduction to E-l. The appellant asserts four errors: lack of knowing and voluntary consent to urinalysis; error by the military judge in failing to allow appellant to present polygraph results to support his credibility on a motion in limine; factual and legal sufficiency…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008