Legal Opinion

Collord v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1952No. Civ. No. 8871Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action under the Contract Settlement Act of ‘1944, 41 U.S. C. § 101, seeking to recover the sum of $26,962.75, allegedly fair compensation due from the Government on a war contract. Prior to filing an answer, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint alleging various grounds therefor. Judge Marsh of this Court, pursuant to an opinion dated December 26, 1950, entered an order denying the motion to dismiss. 94 F.Supp. 828. Subsequently, defendant filed an answer to the complaint.

Defendant has now filed a motion for summary judgment alleging…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Sarnoff v. CiagliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Michel v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Shapiro v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API