Legal Opinion
Michel v. Meier
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 4, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 6869PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
The questions before the Court for consideration arise put of various motions filed by plaintiff and defendants under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A.:
I. Motion of William A. Meier Glass Company to enter judgment in behalf of said defendant against the plaintiff. Rule 56(b) and Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
II. Motion of Rochester Glass Corporation to enter judgment in behalf of said defendant against the plaintiff. Rule 56(b) and Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
III. Motion of plaintiff for the entry of partial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Perry v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Tiedman v. American Pigment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Duhame v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.