Legal Opinion
Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1951No. 2811PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a stockholder in Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, brought this action on his own behalf and on behalf of other stockholders of Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation to require an accounting of profits allegedly diverted from Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation and Catalyst Research Corporation to the Mine Safety Appliances Company. The named defendants are various participants in this alleged diversion of profits. By reason of the ownership by Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation of stock in Catalyst Research Company, this action constitutes a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Johnson v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- Kiser v. General Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Green v. WalshDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.