Legal Opinion

Sarnoff v. Ciaglia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 22, 1947No. 9442PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.

The appeal at bar raises questions concerning Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. 1

Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. Plaintiffs, residents of Pennsylvania, have alleged in their complaint, as elaborated in the bill of particulars and affidavits, that defendant, a resident of New Jersey employed as adviser by plaintiffs, “fraudulently and for the purpose of intentionally deceiving, cheating and defrauding the plaintiffs,” represented to them that machinery they had ordered from the F. J. Stokes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Weisser v. Mursam Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942
  5. Merchants Indemnity Corp. of New York v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API