Legal Opinion

State v. Darrow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1986No. 8610SC441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant argues that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because the evidence was insufficient to show that he violated the terms of the agreement. We disagree.

Defendant was allowed to participate in the felony diversion program pursuant to an agreement with the State under G.S. 15A-1341(a). This probationary status, however, is a matter of grace, not of right. State v. Lombardo, 306 N.C. 594, 295 S.E. 2d 399 (1982). Consequently, in probation revocation proceedings, grounds for revocation need not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. LombardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. BainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. DampierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. BaconCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. CohenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API