Legal Opinion
State v. Lombardo
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1982No. 130A81PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, Justice.
I
A
In light of our holding below that the exclusionary rule is not applicable in probation revocation hearings, an extensive recitation of the facts in this case is unnecessary. However, in order to address the erroneous reasoning of the Court of Appeals, we summarize the essential facts.
Defendant was convicted of felonious sale and delivery of marijuana, a violation of G.S. 90-95(a)(l), in the Superior Court, Hyde County, on 13 August 1979. He received a five-year prison sentence which was suspended. Defendant was placed on probation. One of the conditions of probation was…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Caffie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- State v. ThackstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.