State v. Small
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to suppress defendant’s in-custody statements because they were not understandingly and voluntarily made.
The unquestioned rule in this jurisdiction is that the ultimate test of the admissibility of a confession is whether the confession was, in fact, understandingly and voluntarily made. State v. Bishop, 272 N.C. 283, 158 S.E. 2d 511; State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1, Cert. denied, 386 U.S. 911. Thus, a confession is involuntary and'not admissible into evidence when it is induced…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.