Legal Opinion

State v. Baines

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 787SC1069PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the admission into evidence of several portions of the testimony of his probation officers. He contends in this regard that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting testimony of the probation officers relating to his ability to work during the period of his probation and the availability of work in the area during that period. He also contends that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting the conclusory testimony of one officer with regard to the wilfulness of his failure to abide by the terms of his probation. We do…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Press v. FalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. State v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. FranksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API