Legal Opinion

VIGIL

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1987No. ID 3050PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3050 MATTER OF VIGIL In Deportation Proceedings A-26787128 Decided by Board March 17, 1988 (1) The group of young, male, urban, unenlisted Salvadorans does not constitute a "particular social group" within the meaning of sections 101(a)(42XA) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

8 U.S.C. §§ 1101

(aX42XA) and 1253(h) (1982). (2) An alien who merely testifies at his deportation hearing that he wishes to remain neutral in the midst of the civil conflict in his native country does not thereby establish a well-founded fear of persecution on account of a political…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  5. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. CHANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  3. RODRIGUEZ-MAJANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  4. R-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  5. IZATULABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API