Legal Opinion
CHANG
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3107PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3107 MATTER OF CHANG In Deportation Proceedings A-27202715 Decided by Board May 12, 1989 (1) Implementation of the one couple, one child policy of the Chinese Government is not on its face persecutive and does not create a well-founded fear of persecution on account of one of the five reasons enumerated in section 101(a)(42)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (1982), even to the extent that involuntary sterilization may occur. (2) An individual claiming asylum for reasons related to the one couple, one child policy must establish that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- Li Yong Cao v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Jin Chen v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.