Legal Opinion

Biltmore Drug Store v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In this proceeding petitioner seeks to prevent the enforcement of an order made by the Superior Court in a supplementary proceeding brought under section 717 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in aid of an execution issued pursuant to an order for the payment of alimony in a certain divorce action commenced by Julius Robbins, plaintiff, against Pauline Robbins, defendant. After the supplementary proceeding had been commenced the plaintiff filed a dismissal of his action.

It is contended that the order for payment of alimony and attorney’s fees pendente lite became inoperative upon dismissal of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shields v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Solomon v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Bork v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API