Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Solomon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1953No. Docket Nos. 15332, 15319, 15428PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Three consolidated cases.]

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Three appeals are presented in a consolidated record. One is from an order pendente lite of the San Francisco Superior Court awarding plaintiff $250 alimony, $2,000 counsel fees, and $500 for costs. Another is an appeal from a similar order of the San Mateo Superior Court awarding plaintiff $75 a month alimony. When the defendant appealed from this second order the San Mateo court ordered her to pay $2,000 as counsel fees and $250 for costs to resist both the appeals. The defendant appealed from that order and this is the third appeal presented here. Plaintiff’s cause of action at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. International Ass'n of Cleaning & Dye House Workers v. LandowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Cal-Dak Co. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Dryer v. DryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. CroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Broadmoor San Clemente Homeowners Assn. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API