Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Simpson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1913No. Civ. No. 1060PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
On September 24, 1910, plaintiff filed her complaint to enforce payment of a judgment entered, on February 12, 1903, in an action as above entitled, which it is alleged and admitted, was never appealed from and that no part of the judgment has been paid. This judgment reads as follows:
“In the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California.
“Annie Simpson, Plaintiff, vs. John Simpson, Defendant. Decree of Maintenance.
“This cause coming on regularly to be heard on the 12th day of February, 1903, upon the complaint on file herein, defendant having failed to appear and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Patton v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Biltmore Drug Store v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Chirgwin v. ChirgwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.