Legal Opinion

People v. Cannady

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 1987No. 85-1587PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Sam Cannady, was found guilty of unlawful restraint, aggravated criminal sexual assault and armed robbery. Following the conviction, the trial court sentenced the defendant as an habitual criminal to life imprisonment under the Habitual Criminal Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 33B — 1 et seq). Defendant appeals, contending that his life imprisonment sentence must be vacated because (1) the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act under which he was sentenced were unlawfully amended; and (2) the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. AmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. VisnackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Giebelhausen v. DaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. WithersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. DuniganIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. TiptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. People v. WesteferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. TerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. MaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API