Legal Opinion

People v. Visnack

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 21, 1985No. 81—2952, 81—2976, 81—3068 consPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Daniel Visnack was convicted of murdering his wife, Sharon. He was also convicted of soliciting the murder and of conspiracy to commit the murder. He was sentenced to natural life imprisonment. He appeals his conviction and sentence. Defendants Randall Weidner and James Kubick were convicted of rape, conspiracy to commit rAurder and murder. Defendant Weidner was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 80 years for murder and 60 years for rape. Defendant Kubick was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 40 years for murder…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. HartfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Randall Weidner v. James H. Thieret, Warden, Menard Correctional Facility, and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. MorissetteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API