Legal Opinion

People v. Withers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 21, 1983No. 81-2795PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of one count of armed robbery, unlawful restraint, and armed violence, but not guilty of attempted murder. Because the armed violence count was predicated upon the unlawful restraint, the circuit court entered judgment only on the armed robbery and armed violence counts. The court subsequently found defendant to be an habitual criminal and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

On appeal, defendant raises as issues whether: (1) the State’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude all blacks from the jury violated his right to a fair trial; (2) defense counsel’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. DuniganIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. People v. HartfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. MorissetteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. McNeilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API