Legal Opinion

People v. Dunigan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1995No. 77252PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bilandic

The defendant, Paul Dunigan, was convicted following a jury trial, in the circuit court of Cook County, of criminal sexual assault. Prior to the sentencing hearing, the State filed a motion to sentence the defendant as a habitual criminal. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 33B— 1.) At sentencing, the State presented evidence that the defendant had twice been convicted of and incarcerated for rape, Class X felonies. At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing, the sentencing court adjudged the defendant to be a habitual criminal and sentenced him to natural life imprisonment. The appellate…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. People v. BoclairIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SharpeIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. ReedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Johnson v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API