Legal Opinion

Stone v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8610SC973PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

I

Defendants first contend that the trial court violated their privilege against self-incrimination when it compelled them to answer discovery requests and when it admitted the answers to the discovery requests into evidence at trial.

This Court previously held that the order compelling the discovery in this case did not violate defendants’ constitutional right against self-incrimination. Stone v. Martin, 56 N.C. App. 473, 289 S.E. 2d 898, disc. rev. denied, 306 N.C. 392, 294 S.E. 2d 220 (1982). Our decision in the previous appeal constitutes the law of the case. See Transportation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Wesley Ex Rel. Wesley v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jay Group, Ltd. v. GlasgowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PR. WILL. v. Omni HomesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. Jennings Glass Co., Inc. v. BrummerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Hunt v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. Seraph Garrison, LLC v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API