Legal Opinion

Jay Group, Ltd. v. Glasgow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2000No. COA99-208PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs, The Jay Group, Ltd., and its wholly owned subsidiary, B. Klitzner & Son, Inc., formerly D. Jay Fashions, Inc., (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Jay Group”) brought this action against defendants Braxton Glasgow (“Glasgow”), Michael Almond (“Almond”), and Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein (“Parker Poe”) for actions allegedly committed in connection with Jay Group’s purchase of a North Carolina corporation, Shoefactory, Inc. (“Shoefactory”), from its German parent corporation, Shoefactory Vertriebs GmbH. In summary, plaintiffs alleged that defendants had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Hudson-Cole Development Corp. v. BeemerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. West v. King's Department Store, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Fox v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Properties, LLC v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Farndale Co., LLC v. GibelliniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Swain v. ElflandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Stamm v. SalomonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API