Legal Opinion
Hertz Washmobile System v. South Orange
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 20, 1956PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 N.J. Super. 110 (1956)
124 A.2d 68
HERTZ WASHMOBILE SYSTEM, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided July 20, 1956.
Messrs. Stoffer and Jacobs for the plaintiff (Mr. Joseph M. Jacobs appearing).
Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer for the defendant (Messrs. Ward J. Herbert and Donald S. Bowie, Jr., appearing).
WEINTRAUB, J.S.C.
Plaintiff seeks a declaration that a Sunday closing ordinance of defendant is invalid. The ordinance, adopted by a vote of 4 to 2, prohibits the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilman v. NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Sarner v. Union Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Wagner v. Mayor, Etc., City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Town of West Orange v. Jordan Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- State v. UleskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.