Legal Opinion
Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 7, 1949PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The essential question here as the constitutional sufficiency of .R. S. 43 :21-19, as amended by ch. 385 of the Laws of 1941 (Pamph. L. p. 992) to contain, this provision:
“(i) (7) The term ‘employment’ shall not include:
“(J) Service performed by agents of insurance companies, exclusive of industrial life insurance agents, or by agents of investment cojnpanies, who are compensated wholly on a commission basis.” 4
Industrial life insurance agents in the service of the appellant company were held to be within the coverage of the Act.
It is said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Goff v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.