Legal Opinion
State v. Ulesky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 28, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
100 N.J. Super. 287 (1968)
241 A.2d 671
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOHN ULESKY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County Court, Law Division.
Decided March 28, 1968.
Mr. Harold Feinberg, attorney for plaintiff-respondent.
Mr. Paul J. Feldman, attorney for defendant-appellant.
McGOWAN, J.C.C.
This is an appeal from the Municipal Court of the Borough of Belmar on a trial de novo under the Rules governing such appeals. The defendant was convicted of violating Chapter 3 of the Revised Ordinances of 1966 of the Borough of Belmar, specifically section 3-1.1…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Stott v. GreengosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Diller & Fisher Co., Inc. v. Arch. Rev. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Sea Isle City v. CaterinaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Marvin A. Eagleston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.