Legal Opinion

People v. Friedman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1950PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Per curiam

In the light of its historical background, section 2144 of the Penal Law may not reasonably be read into section 2147, dealing with “public selling * * * upon Sunday” (L. 1785-1788, Vol. 2, pp. 679-680; 1 Rev. Stat of N. Y., 1828 [1st ed.], part I, ch. XX, tit. VIII, art. 8, pp. 675-676; ibid. 1836 [2d ed.], Vol. 1, p. 675; ibid. 1845 [3d ed.], Vol. 1, pp. 849-850; ibid. 1851 [4th ed.], Vol. 2, p. 83; ibid. 1858 [5th ed.], Vol. 2, p. 936; ibid. 1875 [6th ed.], Vol. 2, pp. 928-929; ibid. 1881 [7th ed.], Vol. 3, p. 1975; L. 1881, chs. 676, 680, Vol. 1, pp. 913, 917; ibid. Vol. 3 [Penal Code],…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API