Legal Opinion
Ebeling v. Continental Illinois Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1969No. Civ. 9219PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.
On February 1, 1967, plaintiffs Frederick M. Ebeling and JeNell M. Ebeling, filed a complaint entitled “Forcible Entry1 ’ in the superior court. The complaint designated Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (hereafter CINB), Pacific Enterprises, Inc., Carl Rosenthal, Milton Rosenthal, Geraldine Rosenthal, Mabel Rosenthal, and certain fictitious parties as defendants. The complaint alleged that the defendants, on or about January 21, 1967, “did violently enter upon said premises (certain real property in the City of Garden Grove) without any claim of right to so…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- United States National Bank v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Connecticut National Bank v. IaconoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.