Legal Opinion
Tevis v. Beigel
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1957No. Civ. 22376PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, Acting P. J.
This is an action to recover “secret profits” from defendants by reason of their dealings with a corporation, of which one of them was then president and a director. The action was originally commenced by the corporation, Midway Foundry of Gardena, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Midway. Subsequently, the corporation made an assignment for the benefit of creditors and the assignee was substituted as plaintiff. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of nonsuit.
In 1952 defendant Beigel, president and director of Midway, and his son-in-law, defendant Sills (doing business together as Universal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mayer v. C.W. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Eckert v. SchaalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.