Crowley v. Langdon

The plaintiff, after demand, replevied from the defendant a stock of goods, claiming a right to their possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed and delivered to him by the defendant. He makes claim to a right of possession under his mortgage upon two grounds, viz.: First, that the- mortgage was due and unpaid; second, that he felt insecure -by reason of defendant’s failure to comply with the terms of the mortgage as *53to insurance, and his failure to replenish the stock as provided in the mortgage. Defendant answered these claims by the contentions: First, that the mortgage was not…