Stahelin v. Sowle
Michigan Supreme Court
Errol’ to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
The declaration claims damages for being prevented from performing a contract.
The plea was the general issue, with a notice that the plaintiff had violated his agreement as mentioned and set forth in his declaration, specifying with particularity wherein he had failed to comply with the agreement, and alleging that—
“At. the time the agreement was made the defendant had a large contract to furnish ties; that he purchased and owned the trees, 'logs, and timber on the ‘Schaffer lot,’ so called; that the same was purchased for the purpose of cutting up into ties; that the white-oak logs, trees,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
- Derby v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Frazer v. FulcherOhio Supreme Court · 1848
- Moss v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Fletcher v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Smiley v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Ehlinger v. Bodi Lake Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Baith v. Knapp-Stiles, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.