Legal Opinion

Woods v. Gaar, Scott & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is trover by mortgagor against mortgagee for the value of goods taken possession of and sold under the insecurity clause in the mortgage.

April 16, 1889, plaintiff bought of defendant a steam threshing rig, consisting of engine and separator, for $1,800. Four hundred dollars was paid down, and the balance, represented by six notes, two of which were payable October 1 and December 1, 1889, two October 1 and December 1, 1890, and two October 1 and December 1, 1891, was secured by a real-estate mortgage of $400, and a chattel mortgage upon the threshing rig. The first two notes, amounting to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cadwell v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Eggleston v. MundyMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Crossroads Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  3. In re PeaseDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1902
  4. Crowley v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API