Legal Opinion

Trinkle v. Schumacher Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 9, 1980No. 79-1848PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDecker, C.J.

Plaintiff Walter Trinkle and defendant Schumacher Company both appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding plaintiff $1,275.50. Trinkle contends that, in addition to the $1,275.50 purchase price of the goods, he is entitled to recover consequential damages. Schumacher Company challenges the trial court’s award contending that plaintiff should be barred from any recovery by the terms of the agreement between the parties. We agree with Trinkle and modify the trial court’s award of damages.

Trinkle ordered 72 yards of fabric for $1,275.50 from respondent Schumacher Company, acting through its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. V-M Corporation v. Bernard Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. U. S. Fibres, Inc. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Linscott v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. Gilbert v. State InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Construction Assoc. v. Fargo Water Equip. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Deere & Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. The Lackawanna Leather Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Martin & Stewart, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API