Legal Opinion
Linscott v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided December 15, 1978No. 49,298PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
Plaintiffs brought this action for damages for breach of implied warranties of merchantability (K.S.A. 84-2-314) and fitness for a particular purpose (K.S.A. 84-2-315). The named defendants are Ivan Smith and his corporation, Bestway Mobile Homes, Inc. The parties have referred to and treated Smith as the defendant and we will do likewise. Trial was to the court. Judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.
At issue on appeal are various questions involving interpretation and application of the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). K.S.A. 84-1-101, et seq.
On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Jones v. AbrianiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Bowen v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Coyle Chevrolet Co. v. CarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Trinkle v. Schumacher Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.