Legal Opinion
Deere & Company v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 12, 2001No. 00-60654PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
Deere financed a combine its dealer, Parker Tractor & Implement Company (“Parker”), sold to Johnson. Johnson was unhappy with the combine because it would not do the job. Deere was unhappy with Johnson because he failed to make any payments on the loan. Johnson wrote Deere a letter revoking acceptance of the combine. Deere refused to take it back. Johnson continued to use the combine. Deere finally sued Johnson to collect the unpaid balance on the loan. Johnson counter-claimed against Deere, as the manufacturer of the combine, for breach of implied and express…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Gilberto Jimenez v. The Tuna Vessel "Granada," Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Chevron USA, Inc. v. Aker Maritime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Marilyn Garner v. Knoll, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- TRIDENT STEEL CORPORATION v. Wiser Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Muhs v. River Rats, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.