Legal Opinion
Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 5, 1931PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
On September 28th, 1920, the plaintiff suffered a compensable injury consisting of a bruised arm, which became infected. He has received, urider a voluntary agreement, as compensation as for total incapacity, one half of his average weekly wages for a period which, up to the time when he made his present application, amounted to five hundred and eighteen weeks. He now has a permanent partial loss of use of his arm to the extent of two thirds of the whole use, and the application is for an additional award based upon permanent partial loss of function. The commissioner ruled that the payments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Franko v. William Schollhorn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Reilley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Olmstead v. LamphierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Costello v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gil v. Courthouse OneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.