Costello v. Seamless Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The loss of two phalanges and of the greater part of the third phalanx of the second finger is by the statute required to be construed as the loss of the Whole finger, and it is admitted that the plaintiff is entitled, in addition to full compensation for total incapacity, to one half of his average weekly earnings for thirty weeks, as for the total loss of the second finger. The matter in dispute is whether he is also entitled to the further award of $3 a week from January, 1921, to May, 1922, as additional partial compensation for incapacity due to the above described condition of the stump…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Franko v. William Schollhorn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Kramer v. Sargent & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- McConnell v. Murphy Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Forkas, Admrx. v. International Silver Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.