Legal Opinion
Reilley v. Carroll
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 25, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinmaist, J.
The award to which this appeal relates was made following the remand ordered on the former appeal from an award of compensation for the same injury—to the plaintiff’s left eye. Reilley v. Carroll, 104 Conn. 569, 134 Atl. 68. The supplemental finding evinces a departure from our instructions, frequently reiterated, that a finding by a commissioner should be confined to a recital of the material and relevant facts found and the conclusions reached upon the subordinate facts, together with the questions of law made by the parties and the rulings thereon. Pettiti v. Pardy Construction Co., 103…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- California Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Czeplicki v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- California Comp. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.