Legal Opinion

State v. Cooey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 1995-0435PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 411.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. COOEY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Cooey,

1995-Ohio-328.] Appellate procedure—Application for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel— Application denied when applicant fails to establish good cause for failing to file timely application to reopen. (No. 95-435—Submitted June 21, 1995—Decided August 30, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 12943. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Richard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Function Junction, Inc. v. CroweSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. AlmashniOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. KoreislOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Perry, 90497 (5-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API