State v. Perry, 90497 (5-12-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Ray A. Perry has timely filed an application for reopening pursuant to App. R. 26(B). Perry is attempting to reopen the appellate judgement, as rendered in State v. Perry, Cuyahoga App. No. 90497,2008-Ohio-5588, which affirmed his conviction for the offense of escape. For the following reasons, we decline to reopen Perry's appeal.
{¶ 2} App. R. 26(B)(2)(d) requires "a sworn statement of the basis for the claim that appellate counsel's representation was deficient with respect to the assignments of error or arguments raised *** and the manner in which the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LesterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. HumphriesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014