Legal Opinion

State v. Cooey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1989No. 88-351PublishedCited by 297 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Cooey advances thirty-three propositions of law in this appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

I

Our analysis begins with those issues primarily affecting the convictions.

A

Cooey’s nineteenth proposition of law is divided into nine parts in which he attacks the sufficiency of the evidence adduced to prove each count of the indictment (except those charging aggravated robbery) and each specification.

Cooey argues that the state failed to prove the prior calculation and design necessary to obtain convictions for aggravated murder under R.C.…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API