Legal Opinion
State v. Cooey
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1995No. 95-435PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant has failed to show good cause for the untimely filing of his application to reopen. See State v. Reddick (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88, 647 N.E.2d 784. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by73 opinions
- Richard Wade Cooey, II v. Ted Strickland, Governor Terry J. Collins, Director E.C. Voorhies, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Richard Cooey v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Cooey v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- State v. AlmashniOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.